RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION
CATEGORY
ACTION DESCRIPTION
01. IDEATION
Low Originality: Ideas presented in projects are often trivial or not sufficiently different from existing ideas. Lack of diversity and creativity in generating new concepts.
02. ESTIMATIONS
Low Accuracy and Caution: Cost and time estimates are often off the mark. The estimation methods used are not reliable and tend to underestimate the risks.
03. BUDGET
Insufficient Control of the Financial Framework: Projects often exceed the established budget. Lack of transparency regarding the allocation of funds to key activities.
04. PLANNING
Improving Completeness and Flexibility: Plans contain basic information, but there is still a need to add detail and improve the planning process. The plan should be adaptable and able to respond to unexpected events and changes.
05. PERFORMANCE
Improved Quest Completion: There are occasional problems with achieving objectives and completing quests. Processes and strategies need to be refined to ensure successful delivery of project objectives.
06. STATEMENT
Improving the Quality of Reports: The quality of reports should be increased, with an emphasis on accuracy and completeness of information. Process records should be continuously updated to reflect the current status of the project.
07. PRIORITY AND RISKS
Solid Identification and Effective Risk Management: Risks are solidly identified and managed in accordance with defined procedures. Priorities are clearly established, which enables effective management of project activities.
08. PEOPLE
Solid Motivation and Effective Collaboration: Teams are solidly motivated and work effectively together. Conflict management and team leadership are in line with expectations, but there is room for further improvement.
09. COMMUNICATION
Solid Transparency and Effectiveness of Communication: Communication is usually transparent and effective. Communication plans are implemented and adhered to, but there is still room for improvement.
10. EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
Excellent Evaluation and Open Access to Learning: Projects are evaluated in an excellent way with a clear focus on key criteria and objectives. Learning from projects is integrated into the company's culture, with active listening to feedback and implementing innovations based on these experiences.
TOTAL SCORE DEFINITION
RANGE
SCORE LEVEL
DESCRIPTION
>33%
Level 1 - Strategic
Indicates that the organization has a low understanding of effective project, idea, and change management practices, which can limit their ability to implement changes successfully. It may be necessary to provide training or consulting to improve their understanding.
34-66%
Level 2 - Preferred
The organization has some understanding of effective project, idea, and change management practices, but there is still room for improvement to optimize their implementation. Specific recommendations could be offered to improve their practices.
67-90%
Level 3 - Maintained
Indicates that the organization has a good level of understanding and implementation of effective project, idea, and change management practices, allowing them to make informed and strategic decisions. Additional suggestions could be offered to further optimize their practices.
91-100%
Level 4 - Excellence
The organization has an excellent level of understanding and implementation of effective project, idea, and change management practices, enabling them to make informed and strategic decisions effectively. In this case, additional recommendations could be offered to help the organization maintain its competitive edge and continue to improve.